Google
A Message Board, Guestbook, or Poll hosted for your website.
NH Insider Discussion Board

Register Login New Posts
 
NH Insider > Forums > National Issues > To my Liberal Friends - Tea Party focus explained
 
Username:  
Password:  
 
   
 


Thread Tools Search This Thread 
Reply
 
Author Comment
 
gormans
Avatar / Picture

Senior Member
Registered: 03/21/06
Posts: 2,004

    11/01/09 at 10:02 AM
  Reply with quote#1

I'm still amazed that people don't get it.  Obviously the media is NOT doing its job.

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=110005



Rush: You're wrong on this one


Posted: September 17, 2009
1:00 am Eastern


By Kimberly Fletcher
© 2009 

I was returning home from taking my son to school Monday when I caught Rush Limbaugh's show as he gave his opinion on why so many people attended the rally in D.C. last Saturday. Rush said we came not because we are fed up with government but because we are fed up with Democrats and the Democrat president. As one of those protesters and one of the coordinators for the Dayton Tea Party in Ohio, I have to tell you, Rush, you couldn't be more wrong on this one – and no amount of analysis, reports or numbers from prior elections is going to change that.

I know why I am protesting and I am very clearly aware of what this movement is about, and anyone who has attended any one of the tea parties knows it, too. I attended four of them and spoke at three. The air in those rallies – and the over 30 smaller community meetings known as Liberty Groups that formed from them – is the same everywhere. We are sick of government corruption and its invasion in our lives.

I completely agree with Rush that this is a conservative movement, but he is equating Republican with conservative as if they are synonymous – and they are not. Rush insists the two parties are not the same, and while I agree that the platforms of the parties are dramatically different, the people serving in office are not. The Republican Party looks great on paper, but the people who call themselves Republicans (but for a few exceptions) either have no idea what the Party stands for or they just don't care.

The tea parties are not protesting a party; they are protesting an oppressive, out-of-control government, and both parties are guilty.

It wasn't the Democrats who pushed No Child Left Behind or the massive expansions to Medicare. It wasn't the Democrats who pushed through  the $700 billion TARP.  It wasn't a Democrat president who threw the Constitution out the window and expanded the powers of government well beyond the Constitution with the Patriot Act and Homeland Security.  It wasn't a Democrat president that tried to legalize millions of illegal aliens and basically called the American people stupid and uncaring for fighting against it.   This fight did not begin with President Obama, his taking office just escalated it.

The reason Barack Obama was elected was because of the two-party system. The people of America didn't know where else to go. How can you be heard when you are told you only have two choices and they both stink? In 2006, voters came out in mass numbers and voted Democrat down the ticket to "teach Republicans a lesson." Not only did that strategy not work, it totally backfired. In 2008, the people bought into the "Change" theme because that is what we all wanted – change in Washington. But the change we got was not what we were promised. We have taken the easy way out for too long. There is no accountability in Washington. There is no transparency. And the only way we are going to get it is to vote both parties out – but not by voting a third party in.

Like Rush Limbaugh, I am adamantly opposed to a third-party option. Voting "third party" simply for the sake of change will only exacerbate the problem. We've already tried the changing of the guard, and it doesn't work. The answer is not to vote third party; the answer is to vote NO party! We need to stop voting by letters the way preschoolers color by numbers. It's time we take all the letters away and stop taking the easy way out. We need to vote people not parties, and issues not politics. That is what these tea parties and protests are about – taking the government back into our own hands where it was always meant to be. But if we allow Rush Limbaugh to convince us we are protesting a party and this whole thing comes down to Republicans versus Democrats, the movement will come to a screeching halt and we will lose all the ground we have gained.

This movement knows no color, no race, no religion, no gender, no party! And we need to keep it that way. We are not protesting a Democrat president; we are protesting the policies of our current president. It doesn't matter what party he is. It only matters that he is going against the will of the people. We are not protesting the Democratic Party. We are protesting people who are completely disregarding the Constitution and introducing socialism into our republic.

 

This isn't about saving the Republican Party; it is about ending government corruption. And we will no longer allow anyone to divide us by race, gender, religion or party. We are not protesting a party; we are fighting for America. We are Americans, coming together to fight for our freedom and our republic. It is as simple as that.

We don't want any more politicians in Washington or anywhere else in this country. We want statesmen – men and women who understand the fundamental principles and guiding values this nation was founded on, men and women who have the courage to stand up for those principles no matter what the cost. We want leaders with integrity and moral character who are willing to sacrifice their lives, fortunes and sacred honor for the public good – men and women who are committed to fighting for a cause that is greater than themselves. That is what we want. And that is what we are fighting for.

Shame on us for not being here before. Shame on us for being asleep at the wheel and allowing this to happen. But we are here now. We are awake. We are engaged. And we are not going anywhere! Enough is enough. No matter what party you are, we are not going to take it anymore. And that, Rush, is what this movement is about.

 

 


__________________
"Evil requires the sanction of the victim" - Ayn Rand
RyanTower
Avatar / Picture

Senior Member
Registered: 04/16/09
Posts: 656

    11/01/09 at 10:25 AM
  Reply with quote#2

Very good post Gormans... A well written article to say the least.


"he is equating republican with conservative as if they are synonymous"
__________________
"Presidents are selected, they are not elected."





Who said it?
NHLady
Senior Member
Registered: 08/25/08
Posts: 1,654

    11/01/09 at 02:31 PM
  Reply with quote#3

Excellent post.  I have been fed up with the Republicans for about 5 years now and joined the Conservative Party a couple of years ago.  I wonder why Rush can't grasp the idea that we are fed up with our politicians regardless of which side they're on. 


__________________
What does "economic justice" mean, except that you want something that someone else produced, without having to produce anything yourself in return?
- Thomas Sowell
gormans
Avatar / Picture

Senior Member
Registered: 03/21/06
Posts: 2,004

    11/01/09 at 05:44 PM
  Reply with quote#4

Rush, while he does his job well, is stuck as an entertainer/cheerleader for the republican party.  It's all about republican rule to him and that is where he loses me.  He does make good points sprinkled throughout the rhetoric, and I think he's being villified by a media bent on making up lies to hit someone below the belt.  The war on Rush, Glenn Beck, and FoxNews should clue people in as to how bad things have gotten.  This isn't just competing news networks against them, it's the White House too!  Just because they don't agree with them!  Our federal government has more pressing things to accomplish than silencing dissent - especially if their news can't be denied.


__________________
"Evil requires the sanction of the victim" - Ayn Rand
NHLady
Senior Member
Registered: 08/25/08
Posts: 1,654

    11/01/09 at 06:13 PM
  Reply with quote#5

I have never listened to Rush, but I did catch Mark Levin's show one evening last summer while driving through upstate NY.  I really enjoyed his show and emailed him the next day.  He actually replied to me and said thanks.

I enjoyed listening to Laura Ingraham when she was on. I also like Jay Severin at times and Michael Graham.

Regarding Fox News and the White House:  Just once I would like the White House to prove that what is being said on Fox is lies.  What angers them is the truth.  I always thought Obama was thin skinned and petty.  He's been fawned over his entire life I imagine so the criticism is hard for him and my belle to swallow. I believe my belle has a lot to do with decision making which really bothers me.

__________________
What does "economic justice" mean, except that you want something that someone else produced, without having to produce anything yourself in return?
- Thomas Sowell
platypus_dude2008
Avatar / Picture

Senior Member
Registered: 09/13/08
Posts: 1,724

    11/03/09 at 08:04 AM
  Reply with quote#6

Quote:
Originally Posted by gormans

Rush, while he does his job well, is stuck as an entertainer/cheerleader for the republican party.  It's all about republican rule to him and that is where he loses me.  He does make good points sprinkled throughout the rhetoric, and I think he's being villified by a media bent on making up lies to hit someone below the belt.  The war on Rush, Glenn Beck, and FoxNews should clue people in as to how bad things have gotten.  This isn't just competing news networks against them, it's the White House too!  Just because they don't agree with them!  Our federal government has more pressing things to accomplish than silencing dissent - especially if their news can't be denied.


Just look at this http://www.usdebtclock.org/ and you'll see where the socialists are leading the nation. At some point, the national debt and the value of our currency will come back to bite us. The damage team Obama is adding to the existing mess will place the eocnomy in great harm.  Mark my words we are in deep trouble.
boborbill
Junior Member
Registered: 01/24/09
Posts: 89

    11/03/09 at 03:41 PM
  Reply with quote#7

you are wrong the same thing that has saved us everytime will save us once more


"TECHNOLGICAL ADVANCMENT"

Do you remember 1983 the computer saved us.

We (the human race) is not operating under the "invisible hand".  laissez faire is dead.  Controlled growth, timed with tech release, is the world we live.  Money represents human work.  By making the furture work more valuable than past work we "The US" will be able to pay off any fake debt.  But this is the wrong way to look at this.  We the human must see the other countries of the world as teams of humans.  Trying to reduce the general suffering of the human race is all of our main goal as part of the human collective.     

__________________
remember the "alimo"
dam
how do you spell ""allimo"?
NHLady
Senior Member
Registered: 08/25/08
Posts: 1,654

    11/03/09 at 04:01 PM
  Reply with quote#8

boborbill

The only thing even close to a technological advance is biotech and stem cells, and it will beat least  ten years before the FDA allows much of that type of treatment to go on in the US. Stem cells and gene therapy will revolutionize healthcare meaning we won't need as many drugs, doctors or hospitals. 


__________________
What does "economic justice" mean, except that you want something that someone else produced, without having to produce anything yourself in return?
- Thomas Sowell
platypus_dude2008
Avatar / Picture

Senior Member
Registered: 09/13/08
Posts: 1,724

    11/03/09 at 04:39 PM
  Reply with quote#9


I don't think we will see the knight riding in on the white horse anytime soon. 1983 was a different time. Our debt today is approaching the point where the USD could soon be replaced by another currency. Also, in 1983 technology was developed predominantly in the US. Today, it can be developed and it profits taken by any number of other countries.

 

Sorry, but this time the US is in dire straits.


SaveNH
Senior Member
Registered: 11/21/06
Posts: 8,617

    11/03/09 at 05:04 PM
  Reply with quote#10

I expect to see many of our Pharmaceutical firms developing new drugs in other countries rather than dealing with US Laws, and Dem pricing demands.


__________________
My name is Howie Howe -

"No man who refuses to bear arms in defense of his nation can give a sound reason why he should be allowed to live in a free country" T. Roosevelt
platypus_dude2008
Avatar / Picture

Senior Member
Registered: 09/13/08
Posts: 1,724

    11/03/09 at 05:11 PM
  Reply with quote#11

Quote:
Originally Posted by SaveNH

I expect to see many of our Pharmaceutical firms developing new drugs in other countries rather than dealing with US Laws, and Dem pricing demands.

Howie, good point. Today the world is flat and innovation and capital will go to where it can generate the most profit. The followers of team Obama have their blinders on if they think that Obama's policy of letting the dollar go and nationalizing industry are going to be helpful.


boborbill
Junior Member
Registered: 01/24/09
Posts: 89

    11/03/09 at 05:12 PM
  Reply with quote#12

wow

sometimes I think what if it was 1426 i am in Europe and I could get 40 friends together then steal a ship and head west.  Plant a flag and start America.

What if it was 1873 and I broke into a bicycle shop and in one weekend build a plane with a rudder in the back not in the front like the "wrong" plane

today i think what could i do with a

1.  x box   (control center)
2.  a 3 dimensional stabilizer (you see them at fairs.  three circles that fit into each other connected to each other on the 0 degree axis,45 and 90 the ride is you spin around but do not get dizzy)
3.  three microwaves
4.  a segway gyroscope platform  (the gyroscope allows you to know where you are after an almost infinite number of random movements from the 3 axis stabilizer)

but then i would have to explain what a particle of gravity is...

bio tech advances will shorten the amount of teen years that the average human goes through in the course of development maximizing the working/productive years.  It will shorten the worker's/common man's retirement years while elongating the ruling classes life.  I enjoy the more we know about cancer the more cancer we have.  It is hard to see bio tech advancement not go into making life better but into eugenics  

oh well you understand that when we landed on the moon a massive thruster fired as our lander approached the moon.  yet in all the photos there is no crater from the lander.  The massive thruster would not only push up on the lander it would blow or push on the dust that is there on the moon creating a crater...

If you(the us) could get to the moon with new tech. Why would you tell everyone(Russia, china) about it...
It makes more sense to pretend you used the most unpractical idea...
fossil fuels...
that way your enemies would put their energies into a doomed to fail space race...

nhlady you have 3 smart boys imagine if they were free to learn and use human knowledge to complete their dreams...



  


__________________
remember the "alimo"
dam
how do you spell ""allimo"?
boborbill
Junior Member
Registered: 01/24/09
Posts: 89

    11/03/09 at 05:36 PM
  Reply with quote#13

serv-d7z2q-1439851900@craigslist.org

this is funny

__________________
remember the "alimo"
dam
how do you spell ""allimo"?
Previous Thread | Next Thread
Reply

  Bookmarks  
Digg Diggdel.icio.us del.icio.usStumbleUpon StumbleUponGoogle Google